SocArXiv – a new open access legal repository?

Introducing SocArXiv, an institutional repository for social sciences.

SocArXiv is modeled on ArXiv, the successful open access preprint repository for scientists. Still in the development stage, SocArXiv is currently a partnership with the University of Maryland and the non-profit Center for Open Science that will be a “free, open access, open source archive for social science research.” ( The “temporary home” of SocArXiv already holds many preprints. At the time of this writing, one preprint has nearly 700 downloads. While there is currently no organizational structure, a quick and dirty search for “law” reveals that legal scholars have discovered and are submitting preprints to SocArXiv.

SocArXiv launched just about a month after the acquisition of SSRN by Elsevier when speculation about maintaining availability of open access scholarship was rampant. Concerns about SSRN include a spate of take-down notices (now abated), questions about Elsevier’s commitment to open access, and its motivation in making the purchase. See Paul Caron’s blog post Is it Time for Authors to Leave SSRN?, Prawfsblog’s SSRN, Elsevier and the Alternatives (again) and In the Open’s For the 1000th time: who will own (and mine) the scholarly record? blog post.

In addition to SSRN’s Legal Scholarship Network, law schools often archive scholarly work at open access repositories that are self-managed (e.g., DSpace) or outsourced to the Digital Commons run by bepress.* Dspace is open source code that requires sufficient institutional technology infrastructure to self-manage the platform. Bepress and Elsevier are vendors of the electronic platforms that hold and organize scholarly output.

From the academic viewpoint, SSRN was generally “free” for scholars submitting research and fee-based for both institutional ejournals and for current awareness services. We’ve received no indication from Elsevier that the fee structure has changed. Bepress has no “free” level – scholars or their institutions must purchase a Selected Works page or Digital Commons package to submit materials. For a more detailed discussion of payment models see Sharing for Social Scientists by Ruth Lewis (May 2016).

If you want to follow development of SocArXiv, the permanent URL will be and the development blog is at In the blawgosphere, information about SocArXiv may be found at LLRX and Prawfsblog.

* For a more complete list of legal repositories, see Robert Richard’s Legal Information System & Legal Informatics Resources: Institutional & Scholarly Repositories: Legal (Selected) at (last retrieved 9/15/2016)

Use of mobile apps

Do you use mobile apps? iBrary Guy is looking at the how legal apps rank in Apple’s store. Today, he looks at the Big Publishers, tomorrow at others. Rank measures downloads, so the big question is whether attorneys actually use the apps. Maybe an analysis of Android apps will follow.

North Carolina cases digitized by State Library

The Goodson Blogson reports that the North Carolina State Library completed digitization of the official North Carolina Supreme Court Reports  through 2012 (volumes 1 – 365) and has made the first 100 volumes of the appellate court reports available. Read the article at the Duke Goodson Law Library blog  and check out the case reporters at the State Library’s North Carolina Digital Collections.

Thanks to the Duke law librarians for the post! Do you know of other reporter collections? Are they authenticated?

Information has value

ACRL recently released its Final Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. It reminds us that users, whether college students or not, start with the perception that information is “free” and lack understanding of how personal information is being commodified.The third frame – “Information has value” – addresses the complex values associated with information by introducing concepts of publishing and intellectual property. It speaks of information “as a commodity, as a means of education, as a means to influence, and as a means of negotiating and understanding the world. Legal and socioeconomic interests influence information production and dissemination.” Read the full framework for tools to incorporate in your reference consults, training or teaching.

Gale Cengage unifies UX

Gale Revamps Popular Product Lines to Create a Unified, Improved and Mobile-Optimized User Experience

Changes to GVRL, InfoTrac and In Context Platforms Enhance Accessibility and Usability

h/t to Library Stuff by Steven Cohen

[Read more…]

Curious about acceptance of online treatises? A regional law library lends nationwide.

Read about just-in-time acquisitions, concurrent ebook lending, and national resource sharing at an historic regional law library that now lends across the U.S. at Dewey B. Strategic by Jean P. O’Grady:

New York Law Institute Goes National: Offers “Just In Time” Research, Desktop Access to 75,000 eBooks to Member Law Firms Across the US . . .